“If any law firm is discovered guilty in the circumstance, we have the legal rights to terminate their license for a lifetime,” claimed Manan Kumar Mishra, chairman of BCI.
An FIR was registered from attorneys who had tried out to block the presentation of a
Right now, the BCI declared the placing up of a workforce to probe the conduct of the attorneys.
“In the meeting, we decided that a 5-member workforce will look into the circumstance. The workforce will go to Kathua and Jammu. They will communicate to men and women about the conduct of BAJ,” claimed Mishra.
The workforce will submit a report to BCI, which will be introduced to the Supreme Courtroom of India on April 19. The BCI also requested the apex court to give it an extension of two extra days to submit the report.
Previous Tuesday, the BAJ had known as a strike from the increasing unlawful existence of Rohingya and Bangladeshi nationals, though alleging that its agitation for a CBI probe into the Kathua circumstance was wrongly staying portrayed as “communal”.
Batting strongly for justice for the target, the BAJ claimed that the probe by the crime branch of Jammu and Kashmir Police was completed on questionable line amid threats and coercion by a workforce of officers from Kashmir Valley which include one who served a jail term for alleged rape and murder of a slight.
On Friday, the Supreme Courtroom had directed the Affiliation to make sure that entry to justice was not denied to the relatives and that no obstruction was brought on to them.
The Supreme Courtroom took a really serious be aware of attorneys obstructing the judicial process in the Kathua gangrape and murder circumstance and initiated a circumstance on its very own accord expressing such impeding of the process of regulation “influences the supply of justice”.
The top court claimed that lawyers’ bodies have solemn duty to not impede advocates representing the accused or the victims’ relatives in the courts.
A bench of Main Justice Dipak Misra and justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud sought responses on the conduct of attorneys from Bar Council of India, Jammu and Kashmir Bar Council, Jammu Large Courtroom Bar Affiliation and Kathua district bar association by April 19.
“In our viewed as opinion no law firm can avert the advocates representing the accused or victim’s relatives in the circumstance,” the bench claimed.
An eight-yr-outdated female was kidnapped, raped and murdered in Rasana village in Hiranagar tehsil of Kathua district in January.
(With inputs from organizations)